Before we dive into the costs and drawbacks of reactive maintenance, let's define exactly what it is and what it entails.
Reactive maintenance, also known as corrective maintenance or run-to-failure maintenance, is a maintenance strategy where repairs and replacements are only performed after equipment has already failed. The focus is on restoring the equipment to its operational state after a breakdown, rather than taking any proactive steps to prevent the failure from happening in the first place. It's a purely responsive approach.
This strategy stands in contrast to two other common maintenance strategies:
-
Preventive Maintenance (PM): This involves performing scheduled maintenance tasks at predetermined intervals, regardless of the equipment's current condition. The goal of PM is to prevent failures by regularly inspecting, servicing, and replacing worn parts.
-
Predictive Maintenance (PdM): This utilizes real-time data and advanced analytics to predict potential equipment failures before they occur. PdM allows for targeted maintenance interventions, optimizing resource allocation and minimizing downtime.
Reactive maintenance is sometimes referred to as "run-to-failure," "breakdown maintenance," or "corrective maintenance." All of these terms describe the same basic approach: waiting for something to break before taking any action. Now, let's move on to part two: